Congress MP Shashi Tharoor Questions PM Modi's Absence from Gaza Peace Summit

Advertisment

The US President Donald Trump and other prominent world leaders have assembled in Egypt for a pivotal summit on Gaza peace. India, on the other hand, has decided to send a junior Minister of State. The low-profile representation of the country at a global discussion has sparked a controversy. Ex-diplomat and senior Congress member Shashi Tharoor is questioning the logic behind this decision.

Did India deliberately signal "strategic distance," or was this a "missed opportunity" that risks diluting the nation's voice on regional stability and post-conflict reconstruction?

Tharoor on India's MoS-Level Representation

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor publicly questioned the government's decision to send Kirti Vardhan Singh, a Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs, to represent India at the Sharm el-Sheikh Peace Summit in Egypt. Noting that the summit was being attended by a "galaxy of grandees," including US President Donald Trump and nearly 20 other world leaders, Tharoor argued that India’s presence at the MoS level "stands in stark contrast to the heads of state gathered there."

Advertisment

While affirming that his comments were "no reflection on Kirti Vardhan Singh, whose competence is not in question," the former diplomat called the choice "puzzling." He suggested the low-level representation signals "a preference for strategic distance, which our statements don't convey."

Concerns Over Impact on Regional Stability Talks

Shashi Tharoor highlighted the possible unfavorable effects of Prime Minister Modi’s absence, particularly concerning India's diplomatic pull at the peace negotiations. He cautioned that only based on "protocol access" would the Indian side be able to restrict its influence over the talks.

Tharoor specifically stated that the country's "voice at the Summit on issues of reconstruction and regional stability may carry less weight than it could have." In a region currently "reshaping itself," the former MoS said that India's "relative absence is puzzling," suggesting that the decision could translate into a missed opportunity to show India's stance on lasting peace in Gaza and the Middle East.

Advertisment

The comments from Shashi Tharoor crystallize the diplomatic tension between a desire for strategic autonomy and the necessity of high-level engagement at crucial international forums. 

India's decision to send a Minister of State to a summit with many heads of state can be seen either as a calculated signal of non-partisanship or, as Tharoor claims, a self-limiting position in the discussions about peace and rehabilitation in a key region.