If AI passes the Turing test, it’s not hard to imagine the robot apocalypse passing the turning test
The Turing test was designed to check whether a machine can exhibit Human-like Intelligence in its work or thought process. To reduce human errors, the modern Turing Test has multiple human interrogators. This Turning test provides a key basis for evaluating AI applications. The Turing test was a provocative thought experiment that helped spark research in the nascent field of AI.
Despite major advances in artificial intelligence, no computer has ever passed the Turing test, and the powers of AI, robots will always be manufacturer biased, and these manufacturers will try to influence people to make costly investments in their beloved robots. With the advances in technology and robotics, it’s not hard to imagine the robot apocalypse. Assuming human-robot relationships can self-regulate is naive. The idea behind a cybernetic revolt requires the robots to want to destroy us.
AI passes the Turing test:
The Turing test was not designed to determine whether a computer can intelligently or consciously think. Robot Apocalypse is a scheming and Machiavellian intelligence that is willing to lie in wait until there are enough robots or penetration of the IoT. The current human-robot relationships may seem entertaining and sentimental. The possibility of robotic self-awareness in the future.
Requirements for Clearing the Turing Test in AI are machines should learn from their past mistakes and should have the ability to recognize patterns in the conversation to respond in a human-like manner. The machine must be able to understand and synthesize the human language in which the interrogator is communicating and retrieve information in real-time to communicate effectively with the interrogator. It should be under motor control.
The words Turing test has been applied to similar competitions around the world. Effectively, the Turning test studies whether the interrogator can determine which a computer and which is a human. The Turing test has opened lots of new avenues for innovation and discovery in the Artificial Intelligence sphere. It eliminates any biased notion toward humans as human negotiators only focus on the content provided by the respondents.
The Turning test gives an unbiased notion about the machine’s ability to behave or perform actions like humans. No one in AI seems to take the failure of the Turing Test as an argument against the possibility of thinking machines. It is also unclear when AI will conclusively conquer the Turing test. The Turing Test remains a useful way to chart the progress of AI that humans will be discussing for centuries to come.